Container Registry for Regulated Enterprises
Your container registry is the gatekeeper of what runs in production. Every container image passes through it. For regulated enterprises, the registry must provide: vulnerability scanning before deployment, image signing verification, access control and audit logging, replication for disaster recovery, and retention policies for compliance.
Comparison
| Feature | Harbor | JFrog Artifactory |
|---|---|---|
| Type | CNCF Graduated, open source | Commercial (free tier available) |
| Artifact types | Container images, Helm charts, OCI | Universal (Docker, Maven, npm, PyPI, Helm, Go, etc.) |
| Vulnerability scanning | Built-in (Trivy integration) | Xray (separate product, additional cost) |
| Image signing | Cosign + Notary support | Cosign support |
| Replication | Push/pull between Harbor instances | Multi-site, federated, push/pull |
| RBAC | Project-based, OIDC/LDAP | Fine-grained permissions, SAML/OIDC |
| Air-gapped | Yes (designed for it) | Yes (self-hosted) |
| Retention policies | Tag-based, label-based | Advanced (property-based, date-based) |
| Cost | Free (infrastructure only) | $150-750/month+ (Pro/Enterprise) |
When to Choose Each
- Choose Harbor if: Container images are your primary artifact type, you want built-in scanning without extra cost, you need air-gapped deployment, and you prefer CNCF ecosystem alignment.
- Choose Artifactory if: You need a universal artifact repository (Java, npm, Python, Docker), you want enterprise support, you need advanced replication topologies, or you're already in the JFrog ecosystem.
- Consider both: Harbor for container images (with Trivy scanning and policy enforcement) + Artifactory for non-container artifacts (Maven, npm). Some enterprises run both.
Kubernetes Recipes
Practical guide for container orchestration and deployment — hands-on patterns you can use today.
View on Amazon →
Luca Berton