"Who owns this model?" is the question that exposes governance maturity faster than any assessment framework. In organizations without clear AI governance roles, the answer is usually a shrug, a finger point, or "the data science team, I think?" This ambiguity is fatal — both for AI project success and regulatory compliance.
DORA requires clear ICT risk ownership. The AI Act demands human oversight with documented accountability. NIS2 expects management bodies to approve cybersecurity measures. You need a RACI matrix that maps every AI lifecycle activity to specific roles.
The Eight AI Governance Roles
Not every organization needs all eight as separate positions. In smaller enterprises, one person may fill multiple roles. But the responsibilities must be explicitly assigned regardless of how many people share them.
1. AI Governance SPOC (Single Point of Contact)
AI Governance SPOC
- Reports to: CTO, CRO, or Board directly
- Accountability: Overall AI governance posture. Regulatory coordination. Board reporting
- Key activities: Chairs AI governance committee, manages regulatory relationships, approves governance policies, owns the unified risk register
- Regulatory basis: AI Act (provider/deployer accountability), DORA (ICT risk management function), NIS2 (management body responsibility)
2. AI Product Owner
- Reports to: Business unit leadership
- Accountability: Business value delivery of specific AI use cases
- Key activities: Defines use case requirements, prioritizes features, accepts model performance, owns business outcomes
- Critical: The bridge between business needs and technical implementation. Must understand both domains
3. Model Developer (Data Scientist / ML Engineer)
- Reports to: AI/ML team lead or platform engineering lead
- Accountability: Model quality, performance, and documentation
- Key activities: Develops models, writes model cards, conducts initial testing, documents limitations and assumptions
- Regulatory basis: AI Act (technical documentation requirements)
4. Model Validator
- Reports to: Risk function (must be independent from development)
- Accountability: Independent verification that models meet performance, fairness, and governance standards
- Key activities: Conducts independent testing, reviews model documentation, issues validation reports, approves or rejects production deployment
- Critical: Must be organizationally independent from model developers. This is a regulatory requirement under DORA and most financial supervisory frameworks
5. Data Steward
- Reports to: CDO (Chief Data Officer) or data governance function
- Accountability: Data quality, lineage, and governance for AI training data
- Key activities: Manages data catalog entries, defines quality standards, approves data access requests, ensures data compliance (GDPR, PDPO, PDPA)
6. MLOps / Platform Engineer
- Reports to: Platform engineering or infrastructure team
- Accountability: AI infrastructure reliability, security, and operability
- Key activities: Manages ML pipeline infrastructure, model serving, monitoring systems, and CI/CD for models
7. AI Security Officer
- Reports to: CISO
- Accountability: Security of AI infrastructure, models, and data
- Key activities: Threat modeling for AI systems, security testing (adversarial, supply chain), incident response coordination, access control management
- Regulatory basis: NIS2 (cybersecurity measures), DORA (ICT security)
8. Compliance / Regulatory Affairs
- Reports to: Chief Compliance Officer or Legal
- Accountability: Regulatory compliance for AI systems
- Key activities: Tracks regulatory changes, manages conformity assessments, coordinates regulatory reporting, advises on compliance requirements
The RACI Matrix
R = Responsible (does the work) | A = Accountable (owns the outcome) | C = Consulted | I = Informed
AI Lifecycle RACI
Roles: SPOC | PO (Product Owner) | Dev (Developer) | Val (Validator) | DS (Data Steward) | MLOps | Sec (Security) | Comp (Compliance)
- 1. Use Case Identification: I | A/R | C | I | C | I | C | C
- 2. Risk Classification: A | C | C | R | I | I | C | R
- 3. Data Sourcing & Preparation: I | C | R | I | A/R | I | C | C
- 4. Model Development: I | C | A/R | I | C | C | I | I
- 5. Model Testing & Fairness: I | I | R | A/R | C | I | C | C
- 6. Independent Validation: C | I | C | A/R | C | I | C | C
- 7. Governance Approval: A/R | C | I | R | C | I | C | R
- 8. Production Deployment: I | C | C | I | I | A/R | R | I
- 9. Production Monitoring: I | I | C | I | C | A/R | C | I
- 10. Incident Response: A | C | C | C | C | R | R | R
- 11. Model Retraining: I | C | A/R | R | C | R | I | I
- 12. Model Decommissioning: A | R | C | I | R | R | C | C
Kubernetes Recipes
Practical guide for container orchestration and deployment — hands-on patterns you can use today.
View on Amazon →Detailed Activity Descriptions
1. Use Case Identification
The AI Product Owner identifies and proposes AI use cases aligned with business strategy. The SPOC is informed to maintain the overall AI portfolio view. Compliance is consulted early to flag regulatory constraints before investment is committed.
2. Risk Classification
The Model Validator and Compliance jointly classify the AI system by risk tier (AI Act: unacceptable/high/limited/minimal; internal: Tier 1-3). The SPOC is accountable for ensuring every system is classified. This classification determines the governance requirements for all subsequent activities.
3. Data Sourcing & Preparation
The Data Steward is accountable for ensuring training data is appropriately sourced, governed, and quality-checked. The Developer executes data preparation. Security is consulted on data handling controls. Compliance confirms lawful basis for data use.
4. Model Development
The Developer is accountable for building the model to specified requirements, including documentation (model card), initial testing, and bias assessment. The Product Owner provides requirements and acceptance criteria.
5. Model Testing & Fairness
The Validator is accountable for confirming that testing is comprehensive and fairness metrics are met. The Developer executes the tests. Security is consulted on adversarial robustness. Compliance confirms the testing scope satisfies regulatory requirements.
6. Independent Validation
The Validator conducts independent assessment — reproducing key results, challenging assumptions, and issuing a validation report with a production recommendation. This must be organizationally independent from development. The SPOC is consulted on any exceptions or escalations.
7. Governance Approval
The SPOC is accountable for the governance decision. The Validator provides the validation report. Compliance confirms regulatory requirements are met. The governance committee may be involved for Tier 1 systems. The decision is documented with rationale.
8. Production Deployment
MLOps is accountable for safe, reliable deployment. Security implements runtime protections. The Developer is consulted on model-specific deployment requirements. The governance approval must be verified before deployment proceeds.
9. Production Monitoring
MLOps is accountable for ongoing monitoring infrastructure. The Developer is consulted on model-specific monitoring thresholds. The Data Steward monitors data quality. Security monitors for adversarial activity.
10. Incident Response
The SPOC is accountable for coordinating the response. MLOps and Security are jointly responsible for technical investigation and containment. Compliance manages regulatory notifications. The Product Owner assesses business impact.
11. Model Retraining
The Developer is accountable for the retraining process. The Validator must re-validate retrained models (proportionate to the change). MLOps executes the deployment of retrained models.
12. Model Decommissioning
The SPOC is accountable for decommission decisions. The Product Owner requests decommission when the model is no longer needed. The Data Steward ensures training data retention policies are followed. MLOps removes the model from production. Security revokes associated workload identities and access grants.
Scaling the RACI
For Small Enterprises (< 10 AI models)
Role consolidation is necessary and acceptable:
- SPOC + Compliance → single person (Head of AI Governance)
- Developer + initial testing → data science team
- MLOps + Security → platform engineering team
- Validator → external advisor or internal rotation (but always independent from developer)
For Large Enterprises (50+ AI models)
Expand roles into teams:
- SPOC becomes AI Governance Office with multiple analysts
- Validators become a dedicated Model Risk Management team
- Data Stewards per business domain (aligned with data mesh)
- MLOps team dedicated to AI platform
- AI Security team within the CISO organization
Automating IT Infrastructure with Ansible
Learn Ansible to automate IT operations and enhance system reliability.
Start on Udemy →Implementation Steps
- Week 1: Map current state — who actually does each activity today? Identify gaps and overlaps
- Week 2: Draft RACI matrix with proposed role assignments. Circulate for feedback
- Week 3: Finalize and get executive sign-off. Communicate to all stakeholders
- Week 4: Begin operating under the new RACI. Track exceptions and escalations
- Month 3: Review and refine based on operational experience. Adjust role boundaries as needed
Related Solution
Navigating AI adoption in a regulated environment? Our readiness assessment maps infrastructure, governance, and compliance gaps in 2-3 weeks.
Explore AI Readiness for Regulated Enterprises →
Luca Berton
